Fragmento

Thomas Kuhn, the late philosopher of science from the University of California at Berkeley, expressed quite eloquently thoughts that we now share regarding periods of transition in science and academia: “The transition from a paradigm in crisis to a new one from which a new tradition of normal science can emerge is far from a cumulative process, one achieved by an articulation or extension of the old paradigm. Rather it is a reconstruction of the field from new fundamentals, a reconstruction that changes some of the field's most elementary theoretical generalizations as well as many of its paradigm methods and applications. During the transition period there will be a large but never complete overlap between the problems that can be solved by the old and by the new paradigm. But there will also be a decisive difference in the modes of solution. When the transition is complete, the profession will have changed its view of the field, its methods, and its goals.” (Kuhn, Thomas [1969] “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” in the Foundations of the Unity of Science, Volume 2, Otto Neurath, editor; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 146-7. Originally published in 1939; a synopsis of this famous essay is now conveniently available on-line at http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/kuhnsyn.html).

Palabras clave: .

2009-03-10   |   649 visitas   |   Evalua este artículo 0 valoraciones

Vol. 2 Núm.6. Diciembre 2008 Pags. 479-482. J Infect Developing Countries 2008; 2(6)